Monday – Friday | 09:00 – 18:00

EV, Battery and Auto-Component Manufacturing in India

India entry for foreign EV, battery and auto-component makers: where you enter the value chain — OEM, ACC cell PLI, pack or component — drives the structure.

Two distinct manufacturing opportunities are opening at once. The first is visible: vehicles, components, power electronics and battery packs are scaling with domestic demand and global OEM commitments. The second is harder: India still needs to localise the battery cell, the most valuable and technology-intensive part of the EV supply chain. That gap is the opportunity and the warning. The Advanced Chemistry Cell battery PLI has substantial policy support, but commissioned domestic cell capacity remains far below the original target, while the Auto & Auto-Components PLI is more developed, with incentives tied to advanced automotive technologies and domestic value addition. For a foreign EV, battery or component maker, the question is not simply whether India is attractive. It is where in the value chain to enter, whether the technology can be localised, and whether the structure can actually earn the incentive over time.

India · Industry

At a glance

  • India's EV opportunity is not one market: a foreign company enters as an OEM, a cell maker, a battery-pack/BMS/power-electronics supplier or an auto-component manufacturer — each with a different incentive, localisation burden and structure.
  • Two main incentives apply: the Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) battery PLI for cells, and the Auto & Auto-Components PLI for advanced vehicles and components.
  • The ACC cell scheme has materially underdelivered against its original commissioning target; India still relies heavily on imported cells, with much domestic activity closer to pack assembly than cell manufacturing.
  • The Auto & Auto-Components PLI is more developed and more claimable, with a premium for battery-electric and hydrogen components.
  • Both production schemes pay on output and a certified value-addition ramp over years — approval is a ceiling, not a cheque.
  • Cell chemistry and equipment are largely external, often with a China connection, so Press Note 3 must be analysed where ownership, control, capital or technology has a land-border link.
India · Industry

India's EV manufacturing opportunity

The demand is real and the commitments are large. India is one of the world's largest and fastest-growing automobile markets, electrification is accelerating — EV penetration reached about 8.5% in FY2025-26 on roughly 2.45 million units sold, led by electric two- and three-wheelers under the PM E-DRIVE scheme, with electric cars the fastest-growing segment — and global and domestic groups are committing serious capital — Hyundai has committed billions of dollars to its India build-out and, with Kia, partnered an Indian manufacturer to localise lithium-iron-phosphate batteries; Tata's battery arm is building a gigawatt-scale plant in Gujarat; and Reliance and Amara Raja are building large-format capacity. That weight of anchor demand and committed capital is what de-risks the market for an incoming cell or component supplier. The harder, and more valuable, part of the chain — the battery cell — is precisely where India is least self-sufficient, and precisely where policy is paying to localise. The opportunity, in other words, is real across the chain, but it is a different opportunity at each point in it.

India · Industry

Which part of the EV value chain are you entering?

An EV entry into India is not one market-entry question; it depends on where the company sits in the value chain, and the structure follows from that, not from the subsidy.

The legal route may be a wholly-owned subsidiary, a joint venture, a technology licence, a contract-manufacturing arrangement, an OEM supply agreement or a state-incentivised manufacturing project. The mistake is to start with the subsidy. The correct starting point is the product, the customer, the technology and the localisation path.

  • An EV OEM or vehicle maker is deciding whether to import, assemble, manufacture or source locally — its route runs through an India subsidiary, the import-linked manufacturing scheme, the Auto PLI, local manufacturing and distribution.
  • A battery-cell maker is deciding whether India can support cell manufacturing at the chemistry, equipment and domestic-value-addition level the ACC scheme requires — usually through a technology licence or joint venture, with the ACC PLI and the Press Note 3 position central.
  • A battery-pack, BMS or power-electronics supplier sits closer to the Auto & Auto-Components PLI and to OEM offtake — through component certification, supply agreements and transfer pricing.
  • An auto-component or supply-chain manufacturer — motors, controllers, drivetrains, thermal systems, chargers, rare-earth magnets, electronics or precision parts — enters through the Auto PLI, state incentives, contract manufacturing and supply agreements.
  • A battery-recycling or materials-recovery business reclaims lithium, nickel, cobalt and graphite from end-of-life cells and scrap — a fast-emerging entry point that the extended-producer-responsibility rules and the import-dependence of cell materials are actively pulling into being.
India · Industry

Two schemes: ACC battery PLI and Auto & Auto-Components PLI

India supports the sector through two distinct production-linked incentives, and a foreign investor should be clear which one applies. The Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) battery PLI, run by the Ministry of Heavy Industries with an outlay of ₹18,100 crore, targets the manufacture of battery cells — the hardest and most import-dependent part of the chain — and conditions support on a steep domestic-value-addition ramp, from at least a quarter rising to around three-fifths within five years, plus a substantial committed investment per gigawatt-hour. The Auto & Auto-Components PLI, with an outlay of ₹25,938 crore over the period to 2027-28, rewards advanced-technology vehicles and high-value components, with a premium for battery-electric and hydrogen fuel-cell parts and a minimum certified value-addition threshold. They are different bets with different eligibility, and the right entry depends on which part of the vehicle a company actually makes.

India · Industry

The battery-cell gap: target versus delivery

The honest starting point is that India's battery-cell ambition is, so far, largely unrealised. The ACC PLI set out to build fifty gigawatt-hours of domestic cell capacity; as of late 2025 only about 1.4 gigawatt-hours — roughly 2.8% of the target — had been commissioned, by a single company (Ola's Krishnagiri plant), and even that capacity had not yet met the value-addition conditions for an incentive claim; the government is reported to be weighing relaxed deadlines and localisation timelines in response. Industry announcements point to far larger numbers, but announced capacity and commissioned capacity are very different things, and India still relies heavily on imported cells, with much domestic activity closer to pack assembly than to cell manufacturing. For a foreign investor this is the opportunity: the demand is real and growing, the policy intent and money are in place, and the gap between target and delivery is the space a serious cell or materials maker can take. It is also the clearest illustration in India of why an incentive approval is not the same as receiving the incentive — the subject of our separate analysis — because the shortfall is a story of missed thresholds and unbuilt capacity, not of policy withdrawn.

India · Industry

Why cells are hard: technology, chemistry, equipment and China

Cells are difficult because the chemistry, the process and the equipment are specialised and largely sit outside India. Battery-cell projects therefore often depend on foreign cell chemistry, process know-how or equipment, and a significant part of global lithium-iron-phosphate and cell-supply capability has a China connection. The established route has been a domestic group taking a technology licence or forming a joint venture with a foreign cell specialist. That makes the Press Note 3 question central rather than incidental: where the investor, the beneficial owner, the technology provider or the transaction structure has a land-border connection, Press Note 3 must be analysed before the structure is finalised, and because much of the relevant technology is of that origin, the structure and the technology-transfer arrangement have to be designed around it from the outset.

India · Industry

The vehicle and component side: where incentives are more claimable

The component and vehicle side tells a more encouraging story. The Auto & Auto-Components PLI has drawn real money — cumulative committed investment in the tens of thousands of crores — and disbursement has begun, though it remains modest relative to the scheme's size and is expected to scale as approved manufacturers hit their production and value-addition milestones; the 2026-27 Budget raised the scheme's allocation in anticipation. The scheme rewards advanced automotive technology — electric and hydrogen powertrains, power electronics, advanced components — with a premium for battery-electric and fuel-cell parts, and it requires a minimum level of certified domestic value addition before any payout. For a foreign component maker, particularly in the higher-value electrical and electronic parts of an electric vehicle, this is a more developed and more claimable incentive than the cell scheme, and it connects directly to the electronics-component opportunity covered on our electronics page.

India · Industry

Foreign OEM entry and the electric passenger-car import scheme

India has also introduced a separate import-linked manufacturing scheme for electric passenger cars (SPMEPCI), allowing approved global manufacturers to import a limited number of qualifying electric four-wheelers (priced at US$35,000 and above) at a reduced 15% customs duty, against a far higher standard rate, if they commit to investing at least ₹4,150 crore and to local manufacturing within three years. The scheme's first application window closed in October 2025 with no applications at all — and Tesla, the most-watched candidate, declined the scheme and entered through showroom imports at full duty — which shows that global OEM entry is still constrained by the investment thresholds, pricing, localisation and market-volume assumptions; the government has since sought industry feedback and kept the scheme open. For a foreign OEM, the scheme should therefore be analysed as one part of the India-entry model, not treated as automatic proof that local manufacturing is viable — the decision still turns on volume, price positioning, the localisation path and the wider Auto-PLI and subsidiary structure.

India · Industry

Industry-specific compliance: battery safety (AIS-156) and waste (EPR)

Two sector-specific compliance layers sit on top of the FDI and tax position and should be built into the plan. The first is product safety and homologation: electric vehicles and their battery systems must meet Indian automotive standards — notably AIS-156 (with AIS-038 Revision 2 for passenger-car batteries) for lithium-ion traction batteries, aligned with the UNECE R100 and R136 standards on thermal runaway, crash and electrical safety — with type-approval and testing through ARAI or ICAT before a product reaches the market. The second is battery waste and recycling: the Battery Waste Management Rules place extended-producer-responsibility obligations on producers, with collection, recycling and minimum recycled-content targets administered through the Central Pollution Control Board's EPR portal, and these obligations increasingly shape both cost and supply-chain design. Both are specialist, evolving and largely standard across producers; they are flagged here so they are designed in, while the general FDI, FEMA and tax positions are covered on the linked service pages, not repeated.

India · Industry

How a foreign company enters

The vehicle is typically a wholly-owned Indian private limited company or a joint venture, on the automatic foreign-investment route that applies to the automobile and battery sectors. The defining structural questions are technology and localisation. Because cell and much advanced-component technology is imported and often Chinese-origin, the Press Note 3 position and the technology-licensing and royalty terms are frequently the heart of the structure, and the transfer pricing on licensed technology and on imported cells, electrodes and materials has to be set at arm's length and documented. Cell manufacturing is usually partnership- or technology-licence-led; component and pack entries may be wholly owned, joint-ventured or customer-led depending on the product and the OEM relationship. The schemes then impose their own discipline: the ACC scheme's steep value-addition ramp and its committed investment per gigawatt-hour force genuine localisation and make intercompany bill-of-materials pricing scrutiny-prone. Each of these is settled before commitment, not after, because each determines whether the incentive, once approved, is actually claimable.

India · Industry

Location: Gujarat, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Maharashtra

The state decision is part of the economics, because state incentives stack on top of the central schemes and the EV manufacturing map is already forming. Telangana has emerged as an anchor for large-format battery manufacturing; Gujarat hosts gigawatt-scale battery and vehicle investment; and Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka each combine established automotive clusters with their own EV policies. The right location turns on the state incentive package, land and power, proximity to OEM customers and the supply chain that feeds the plant, and the talent pool — and, as with every incentive-linked manufacturing decision, it should be chosen together with the regime and the incentive position, well in advance, not after.

India · Industry

Timeline and incentive-claim sequence

An EV or battery entry runs as overlapping workstreams. The Indian entity or joint venture is formed first, with the technology-licensing terms, the FEMA reporting and — where the technology or capital has a land-border connection — the Press Note 3 approval, which is the long pole. The PLI eligibility and value-addition plan, the state package and the site run alongside; then the long-lead capital equipment, the plant build and the supply-chain and offtake contracts. Cell gigafactories are capital-heavy and slow, with commissioning years from commitment, while pack assembly and many component lines move faster. Commercial production then starts the production and sales clock the incentive is measured against, and claims follow year-ends, with value-addition certification and verification before any payment. These are indicative stages only: real timelines vary widely by segment, technology, partner, state and the Press Note 3 position, and nothing here is a commitment or guarantee of any particular timeframe — each project must be planned on its own facts.

India · Industry

Where this goes wrong

  • Starting from the subsidy rather than from the product, the customer, the technology and the localisation path.
  • Reading the headline cell-capacity ambitions as delivered capacity, when most of it is announced rather than commissioned.
  • Treating an ACC or Auto-PLI approval as committed money, when both pay on production and value addition over years and the cell scheme has disbursed little.
  • Treating the electric-car import scheme as proof that manufacturing is viable, when its first window drew no applications and the most-watched entrant declined it.
  • Leaving the Press Note 3 and technology-licensing position unresolved where the cell or component technology has a land-border connection.
  • Leaving transfer pricing on licensed technology and imported materials until claim time, and handing the audit a contestable claim.
India · Industry

How ATB Corporate helps

ATB advises foreign EV, battery and component makers on entering India, and matches the structure to where the company sits in the value chain — OEM, cell maker, pack and power-electronics supplier or auto-component manufacturer — rather than to the headline scheme. We work the entity or joint venture and the route, the Press Note 3 and technology-licensing position at the centre of any cell or advanced-component deal, the ACC and Auto-PLI eligibility and value-addition plan, the import-scheme analysis where an OEM is weighing it, the state and location package, and the transfer-pricing and exchange-control structuring around it — built for the production-and-value-addition reality on which both schemes pay. The conversion point is simple: the opportunity is not the subsidy, it is structuring the entry so the technology, the approval, the localisation and the incentive all work together. For groups combining an India base with a Gulf presence, the decision sits within the India-UAE corridor the firm works across.

Questions

EV & Batteries — Answered

No. Battery cells are the highest-value gap, but commercially realistic entries also exist in battery packs, BMS, power electronics, motors, controllers, charging hardware, thermal systems, rare-earth magnets and advanced auto components — each with a different incentive and structure. The right route depends on where the company sits in the value chain.

Two main production-linked incentives: the Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) battery PLI (outlay ₹18,100 crore) for cells, and the Auto & Auto-Components PLI (outlay ₹25,938 crore) for advanced vehicles and components, with a premium for battery-electric and hydrogen parts. Demand-side purchase subsidies and an import-linked manufacturing scheme sit alongside. Both production schemes pay over years against output and certified value addition.

Because cell manufacturing is hard and import-dependent. As of 2025-26 only a small fraction of the ACC scheme's 50 GWh target had been commissioned, and even that had not yet met the value-addition conditions for a claim. Most existing capacity is pack assembly using imported cells. The technology is largely external and the value-addition ramp is steep — which is exactly the open opportunity for a serious cell or materials maker.

India has introduced such a scheme (SPMEPCI): qualifying manufacturers can import a limited number of electric cars priced US$35,000 and above at a reduced 15% duty if they commit at least ₹4,150 crore and local manufacturing within three years. The first application window closed with no applications, and Tesla declined it, entering through showroom imports at full duty. It should be analysed carefully against the investment thresholds, value-addition requirements, pricing and market strategy, and treated as one part of the India-entry model rather than proof that manufacturing is viable.

Cell projects are often best entered through a joint venture or technology licence because the chemistry and equipment are imported, while battery-pack, power-electronics and component businesses may be viable through wholly-owned subsidiaries or OEM supply structures. The right route depends on the technology, the customer base, the Press Note 3 position, the state incentive package and the localisation path.

Press Note 3 must be analysed where ownership, beneficial control, capital, technology transfer or licensing has a land-border connection — in practice, a China connection. Press Note 2 of 2026 (issued 15 March 2026) softened the rule: a land-border beneficial owner of 10% or less with no control now uses the automatic route with DPIIT reporting, while above 10% or with control prior government approval still applies. It is central in batteries because much lithium-iron-phosphate and cell technology is of that origin, so the structure and the technology-transfer arrangement must be designed around it from the start.

Yes. The Battery Waste Management Rules place extended-producer-responsibility obligations on producers — covering collection, recycling and minimum recycled-content targets — administered through the Central Pollution Control Board's EPR portal. These obligations shape cost and supply-chain design, and, combined with the import-dependence of cell materials, are turning battery recycling and materials recovery into an entry opportunity in their own right.

Electric vehicles and their battery systems must meet Indian automotive standards — notably AIS-156 for lithium-ion traction batteries, with AIS-038 Revision 2 for passenger-car batteries, aligned with the UNECE R100 and R136 standards on thermal runaway, crash and electrical safety — with type-approval and testing through ARAI or ICAT before a product reaches the market.

EV & Batteries

In India’s EV and battery sector, the ACC and Auto-PLI pay on production and value addition, not on approval, and technology-licensing and Press Note 3 frame any cell deal.

Licensing, approvals and any tax treatment are decided by the authorities on the facts. Talk to our team when you are ready.

Get in touch